Suzie's* theory on ... Plurals
The English language was surely invented purely for the purpose of confusing people and making English a difficult area to teach. There are numerous flaws with the English language. One that is quite non-sensical is the existance of 's' to signify plural form. For example:
1 dog
2 dog
50 dog
3457 dog
many dog
lot of dog
Do we really need the s?
Perhaps the Chinese are onto something...
*Mop refused to put her name to this theory. I personally think this is a much more pertinent issue than romance blah blah blah....
posted by Mop and Suzie at 6:49 PM
2 Comments:
Do you really blame me for not wanting to put my name on this theory? Guess you can tell who the teacher is "Miss Suzie"... I personally have better things to think about other than the bad structure of the English language, like debating whether or not I am going to go out on Saturday night... I think you just get really bored when I am not home sometimes Suz!
Thursday, June 16, 2005 3:19:00 PM
maybe we should follow the aboriginal example:
one dog
some dog
big mob of dog
and just forget the numbers as well, after all maths is a pain to teach as well!
Friday, June 17, 2005 9:46:00 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home